Shakespeare and the Literary Heritage

How have extremes of emotion expressed in Titus Andronicus and selected WWI poetry been effectively created by the writers’ craft and performance of the drama text on stage, on screen and in the classroom?

Both William Shakespeare and the poet, Wilfred Owen, have expressed strong emotions in their texts through the use of things such as metaphors, personification, the iambic pentameter, and the use of emotive language.

One of Shakespeare’s earlier plays, Titus Andronicus, is extremely bloody and gruesome and it is full of murders, rapes, mutilations and general plotting. The play shows how a series of very unfortunate events completely upend highly respected Roman general, Titus Andronicus’s life. Upon returning from war, Titus executes the captured enemy Queen Tamora’s son resulting in the beginning of Tamora’s plot for revenge. All in all, Titus’s sons are beheaded, his daughter raped and mutilated, his last surviving son is banished, and he himself is driven to insanity. Shakespeare transcribes these dark and sinister events through different language techniques in the characters’ dialogue which expresses their own anger and distress.

Wilfred Owen’s poems, Dulce et Decorum est, which means “sweet and fitting to” and Wilfred Owen uses it in the context that it is “sweet and fitting to die for your country”, and Anthem for Doomed Youth, are both poems about World War 1. Wilfred Owen was a soldier in the First World War and his poems were popular because they pointed out the hardships and all that is wrong with war. Both of the poems’ messages are quite similar, in the sense that soldiers are surrounded in death and misery while in the battlefield, though Dulce et Decorum est focuses on the post war trauma that causes soldier to constantly have images of the pain and agony of war in their head, whereas Anthem for Doomed Youth tells us that the soldiers who die in battle do not have a proper funeral and the sound of warfare around them, are their “passing-bells”. As Shakespeare does, Wilfred Owen uses language devices to express the pain and suffering of war.

At first, Shakespeare’s play was quite popular with the audience, most likely for its originality with the violence and the fact that it was extremely graphic. This suggests that people enjoyed watching other peoples’ misfortunes and that is relatable with modern times, as horror films are quite popular nowadays. Titus Andronicus was believed to be written in between 1588 and 1593 and the debut of the stage performance was thought to have been in 1594. The play was built around violence and anger, which was displayed through the characters’ actions, when Tamora had Titus’s daughter, Lavinia, raped and mutilated out of revenge and anger, and through dialogue, during Titus’s soliloquy about the tribunes. The constant violence and plotting, drew a large audience and this was one of Shakespeare’s earliest plays that put over Shakespeare as a playwright.

Wilfred Owen was a gay English soldier, who was used to being an outcast of society, and so he was when he spoke out against war after experiencing what a battlefield was really like. But in his poems he put across his deep passion and anger for war and he highlighted the violence in the battlefield to give the reader a good idea of what the soldiers felt during a battle. He was strongly against war and this shows in a lot of his poems, like Dulce et Decorum est and Anthem for Doomed Youth. Wilfred Owen fought in World War 1 and unfortunately, he died towards the very end of the war. The emotion outputted in his poems is quite similar to Titus Andronicus; full of anger and hate. A lot of real, detailed violence is written by Owen, for example the trench warfare and the gas attacks, just like in Titus Andronicus, when all the violent murders and graphic crimes occur.

 

Shakespeare uses extended comparisons which are often metaphorical to compare certain characters with inanimate objects for extremity. He uses these comparisons to exaggerate the characteristics of certain characters. In act three, scene one, Titus Andronicus has a soliloquay about trying to reason with the tribunes. Titus’ sons, Martius and Quintus, have been falsely imprisoned for the murder of Bassianus and Titus is deciding whether it is worth it to try and make the tribunes listen to his case. However, he has many doubts about whether it will have any effect as he says that he would rather “tell my sorrows to the stones” as although they can’t talk back, or “answer my distress,” he would prefer them to tribunes. Titus says that while he would weep, the stones would “receive my tears and seem to weep with me,” which is better than what he expects the tribunes to do. In this passage Shakespeare is going so far to display the emotion of hatred Titus has towards the tribunes, to compare them with stones that are personified with characteristics that are the opposite of what authors would usually compare stones with, just to show how hard and merciless these tribunes are.

Shakespeare uses a simile to describe the stones, which is then used in comparison to the tribunes. In Titus’ soliloquay, he says that “a stone is as soft as wax,” and he then goes on to say that “tribunes are more hard than stones.” Yet more personificatino is used, as Titus says that “a stone is silent, and offendeth not,” while making a point that a although a stone doesn’t speak, it won’t offend you, whereas tribunes will “doom men to death.” This is showing extremes of emotion in Titus, as he is going so far into detail to describe just how much he loathes the tribunes and thinks that they are against him and would never help him, even though they are the council of Rome.

In Wilfried Owen’s Dulce et Decorum est, the poet uses many extended comparisons and he amplifies his metaphors to produce more extremitiy in his poems. While describing the soldiers fighting in a war, he said they were “drunk with fatigue.” This is a metaphor for how tired the soldiers were and Owen used “drunk” to show how extremely tired they were. He amplified this metaphor by adding an adjective that meant that they had too much to the point where it was beyond their control. Owen also uses personification for extremity when describing the canons, by saying that even they are tired, “outstripped Five-Nines that dropped behind.” War tiring everyone and everything is a focal point in Owen’s Dulce et Decorum est.

Owen also uses a hyperbole in the opening line to create a strong impressino of the soldiers in the war. He says that the soldiers are bent double, which means they are bent over, but not exactly bent in two. It conveys the feeling of exhaustion of the soldiers which is an extreme emotion that is felt by the soldiers.

Both Shakespeare and Wilfred Owen use extended comparisons and metaphorical statements to put across the extreme emotions that they are trying to get the reader to understand and sympathise with. They amplify their metaphors and similes to exaggerate the emotions being displayed which, in turn, creates more extremity.

 

The iambic pentameter underlies a constant rhythm in both the play and poetry and it used, and broken, to create a feeling of extreme emotion, whether it is anger, fear or sadness. The author or poet breaks and undermines the rhythm which can clearly be heard when read aloud to convey these extreme emotions. Doing this frequently, especially on the final stressed syllable will interrupt the flow of the text, which will signal to the audience the emotional distress being displayed.

In act three, scene one, Shakespeare breaks the iambic pentameter to implement Titus Andronicus’ distress and fear. During Titus’ soliloquay, he says,
“Receive my tears and seem to weep with me;
And, were they but attired in grave weeds,”
There is a syllable left out in the second line; the first line has ten, whereas the second has nine. This is clearly heard when read aloud, and this shows the distress and uncertainty in Titus’ voice, when talking about the tribunes. This break in the rhythm affects the rhythm of the whole soliloquay, and it is used for effect, to display the extremes of emotion in Titus and to further back up his stress and hopelessness.

Wilfred Owen uses the iambic pentameter to create a strong, powerful image for the reader, so he can convey his extreme negative emotions on war. However, he also has breaks in his rhythms. In his poem, Anthem For Doomed Youth, it is used for confusion as he opens with a question that has an extra syllable to support his questioning.
“What passing-bells for these who die as cattle?
Only the monstrous anger of the guns.”
By having this anomalous syllable and this break in the rhythm, Owen is putting across a sense of confusion and hesitation. This is an extreme of an emotion that questions war and argues against it. The next line carries on in the solid rhythm of the iambic pentameter.

 

Both Shakespeare and Wilfred Owen have used emotive language in their respective plays and poems, which is the most impactful way of displaying extremity in emotions as the reader can directly read the emotions in the text. The language can easily be influenced by the author to try and invoke emotions from the reader, and often it is used to get the reader to empathise with characters.

In act three, scene two of Titus Andronicus, Titus expresses his misery through the use of negative nouns, adjectives and verbs. Titus has found out that two of his sons were executed for a crime they did not commit, and he cut off his own hand, believing it would be exchanged to save his sons’ lives.
“As will revenge these bitter woes of ours.
Marcus, unknit that sorrow-wreathen knot:
Thy niece and I, poor creatures, want our hands,
And cannot passionate our tenfold grief
With folded arms. This poor right hand of mine
Is left to tyrannize upon my breast;
Who, when my heart, all mad with misery,
Beats in this hollow prison of my flesh,”
In this short passage, there are many negative words and phrases used to emphasise the torment that Titus is feeling. The extreme emotion of misery and despair are heard through words and phrases such as “woes”, “sorrow-wreathen”, “poor”, “grief”, “misery”, “hollow” and “tyrannize”. These words are impactful on the reader and we get a strong, vivid idea of how Titus is feeling and what he is experiencing because Shakespeare has intentionally used emotive language and certain words to have that effect.

In Wilfred Owen’s Anthem For Doomed Youth, the title already uses emotive language that foreshadows the poem, and tells us the “doomed” fate of the young soldiers who go to war. Throughout the poem there are many examples of emotive language used for negative emotions that point to death. Owen uses words such as “die”, “mourning”, “demented” and “sad”. These words depict the melancholy mood of the poem and makes the reader sympathise with the soldiers, and the hardships they have to go through. There are also many terms that are used to describe death which is makes the mood seem even more miserable and hollow. “Passing-bells”, “orisons” and “pall” are used to describe the aftermath of the deaths of the soldiers. This creates an extreme emotion of depression and sombreness which Owen has purposefully used with the intention to create this extreme emotion.
“No mockeries now for them; no prayers nor bells,
Nor any voice of mourning save the choirs,”
The constant use of “no” and “nor” by Owen in these two lines give a sense of hopelessness, like everything is coming to an end. This is an example where language triggers an emotional response in the reader and the constant theme of doom in this short passage, supports the title of the poem, and expresses extreme emotion.

 

All in all, both Shakespeare and Owen express their extremes of emotions extremely well, with both the play and the poems using many language devices and techniques to display them. Shakespeare uses anger, fear and revenge as his main emotions that he tries to get the reader to understand and sympathise with; with Titus losing everything he has worked for in his whole life, to the many crimes and murders that occured to trigger these emotions of revenge. On the other hand, Wilfred Owen chooses to focus on the reader empathising with his views, and uses extremes of emotions for sentimental purposes that show how the soldiers in wars suffer unfairly, and Owen points out the corruption and injustice of war. Both authors are immensely talented and influential in what they do and they will be remembered for invoking all of these emotions in the millions, if not billions, that have come across their great works.

 

 

 

 

 

Act 2 Scene 2 Summary

The next morning Titus and his sons wait outside the emperor’s palace and prepare for a day of hunting.
Titus says he didn’t sleep well last night but he has a feeling it’s going to be a good day.
Saturninus, Tamora, Bassianus, Lavinia, Chiron, Demetrius, and a bunch of attendants enter and Titus greets them.
Saturninus cracks a joke about how it’s way too early in the morning for newly married ladies to be awake (since they’re probably exhausted from the all the previous night’s steamy activities).
Lavinia announces that she’s not tired at all – in fact, she’s been awake for hours.
As everyone talks excitedly about the big panther hunt, Chiron and Demetrius snicker that they’re hoping to “pluck a dainty doe to the ground,” which is a crude metaphor for their plan to rape Lavinia while everyone else is hunting for panther.

Act 2 Scene 1 of Titus Andronicus Summary

Alone in front of the Senate-house, Aaron delivers a soliloquy (a long speech that reveals a character’s innermost thoughts to the audience) about Tamora’s rise to power in Rome. Since Tamora and Aaron are longtime secret lovers, Aaron is hoping to benefit from Tamora’s new status as Rome’s imperial first lady. Aaron also brags that, since Tamora is basically his love slave, he’ll soon be in a position to destroy Rome. (Aaron never really explains why he wants to do this.)
Chiron and Demetrius show up and they’re in the middle of a big, nasty argument, which goes something like this: Chiron: “I’m just as tough as you are and I’m going to seduce Lavinia.” Demetrius: “You’re a wimp and I’m the one who’s going to seduce Lavinia.”
Aaron steps in and says Chiron and Demetrius are crazy if they think they’re going to fight over Lavinia in public. For one thing, Lavinia’s not the type of girl to cheat on her husband. Plus, Bassianus isn’t the type of guy to stand around while two punks try to hit on his wife.
Aaron announces there’s a way Chiron and Demetrius can both have Lavinia – during tomorrow’s big panther hunt, they can take turns raping Lavinia in the forest.
Chiron and Demetrius think this is an excellent idea.

http://www.shmoop.com/titus-andronicus-shakespeare/act-2-scene-1-summary.html

Act 1 Scene 1 of Titus Andronicus Summary

After the death of the Emperor of Rome, his two sons, Saturninus and Bassianus, ask the masses to determine who should succeed to the throne. The first invokes his natural rights as the first-born son, the second calls upon his virtue and graciousness. They are silenced by the Tribune of the People, Marcus Andronicus, who announces that the people of Rome have elected to the throne Titus Andronicus, a great general who has spent the last ten years and lost twenty-one sons vanquishing Rome’s enemies. Titus enters to great fanfare, trailed by four living sons and two in coffins; he brings with him the captives Tamora, Queen of the Goths, her three sons, and Aaron the Moore. Despite a desperate plea from Tamora, Titus orders, following Roman custom, that Tamora’s oldest son be ritually sacrificed in exchange for Titus’s own dead offspring.
Marcus offers Titus the scepter of Rome on behalf of the people, but Titus refuses it on account of his age. Instead, he states that Saturninus should be emperor because he is the eldest son; Saturninus returns the favor by taking Lavinia as his empress. Bassianus revolts against this, claiming that Lavinia is betrothed to him. He spirits her away, with the aid of Lavinia’s remaining brothers Lucius, Mutius, Quintus, and Martius. When Mutius intercedes with Titus on behalf of his fleeing sister, Titus strikes him down and kills him. It is only after his other sons plead with him that Titus even allows Mutius to be interred in the family tomb.
Publicly humiliated by the loss of Lavinia, Saturninus announces that he will instead take Tamora as empress. The new empress slyly advises him to accept the apologies of Titus and his sons, secretly promising Saturninus that she will help him find another day to exact revenge on the Andronici. The new emperor closes Act 1 by declaring it a love-day and inviting everyone to the court for a feast. Titus offers to organize a hunt for him the next day, and Saturninus accepts.

http://www.sparknotes.com/shakespeare/titus/section1.rhtml

Theme Study

Corrupting Influence of Power By Kamrul Shikdar

Introduction

I’m going to show you how power can cause people to be corrupt and that even those who society trusts and admires, can turn out to be corrupted by the power given to them. The corrupting influence of power in this context means that power corrupts people and that the more power you have, the worse the acts of corruption are.

Film: LA Confidential

LA Confidential is a highly acclaimed film starring Russell Crowe and Guy Pearce. It is about two cops in Los Angeles; Bud White, a hard, violent cop with aims for justice and Ed Exley, an ambitious, intelligent cop who wants to climb the ladder in power in the police department. The film is set in the 50s and one of its objectives is to show the corruption in the police department. This was a time where acts of corruption and violence caused officers to gain respect and promotions such as the incident where Exley shot several escaped criminals in self defence which earned him respect from the other officers and the name “Shotgun Ed”. Examples of corruption from police officers involve taking bribes, unnecessarily beating thugs, murdering fellow and ex officers to cover your own acts of corruption and lying to the public to uphold the image of the police force. These all come from having power within the police department and those who have the most power, can commit the biggest crimes as they can cover up their tracks and frame other people which was shown in the film.

Throughout the entire film corruption is shown by the police in the cases of both the “good guys” and the “bad guys”. For example, White and Exley, who portray the “good guys” dangle the also corrupt District Attorney from a high window to achieve information about other corrupt officers, the “bad guys”. Even though their intentions are good, they use their power as police officers to intimidate people into recieving information.

Among the officers, there is a general lack of concern for the different acts of corruption and in some cases they are encouraged to do them in order to get promoted. The captain of the police force, Dudley Smith asks White to assist him in beating various people up. When White shows a lack of enthusiam in hurting possibly innocent people, Smith tells him that he is disappointed in him and that he must remember what he has to do in order to get more power as a cop. This shows that desires for power and power itself is often achieved by a means of corruption because those that grant you that power are usually corrupt themselves.

Smith, the most powerful officer in the department, is also the villain of the film. At the start of the film, he tells Exley that he couldn’t become a detective without bending the law which shows that he has already done multiple acts of corruption. He gives an example which was if he would shoot a hardened criminal in the back. Exley said that he wouldn’t. Smith is involved in the murders of other and former officers, framing innocent people, tricking officers into killing each other and many others acts of corruption. These acts are allowed to be achieved by his great influence and power in the police department. His power also allows him to get away with them as he has influnce over the media and the department because he is considered a “hero”. This is proven right until the end where he and Exley are in a hotel which was a trap that Smith had set up to murder White and Exley. Exley had recently found out that Smith was actually the one behind the murders of several people including his father who was also a detective. Both he and White arrive at the hotel and have a gunfight with Smith’s men. After it seems like White and Exley have taken them all out, Smith turns up and shoots White thus wounding him and leaving him unconscious. Smith tells Exley that the department will again make up a cover story for him and that he will get away with it once again. Realising that Smith was right Exley shot Smith in the back, which is an example of foreshadowing at the beginning of the film. This also proves Smith right, that you do have to bend the law as a cop if you want to climb the ladder. At the end of the film, corruption still proves to be a key factor in the police department because the police are prepared to change the story and call Smith a hero. Exley, after revealing the entire truth to the senior officers, offers to keep quiet in exchange of gaining a medal of honour and a promotion. This shows that Exley is prepared to be a police puppet in order to gain his ambitions which are to climb the ladder in the police force. This shows that even though the “good guys” have won, the influence of power still affects the police department which means that the entire system hasn’t changed and it gives the viewers the impression that it never will.

Poem: Sonnet 66 by William Shakespeare

Tired with all these, for restful death I cry,
As to behold desert a beggar born,
And needy nothing trimm’d in jollity,
And purest faith unhappily forsworn,
And gilded honour shamefully misplaced,
And maiden virtue rudely strumpeted,
And right perfection wrongfully disgraced,
And strength by limping sway disabled
And art made tongue-tied by authority,
And folly, doctor-like, controlling skill,
And simple truth miscalled simplicity,
And captive good attending captain ill:
Tired with all these, from these would I be gone,
Save that, to die, I leave my love alone.

In Sonnet 66, Shakespeare expresses a desire to escape from a world that is filled with corruption and evil. He lists various examples of different types of corruption, and how certain people use power and authority to get what they want even when they are undeserving. Alternatively, the poet also gives us examples of deserving individuals who are oppressed by the ‘system’ and suffer from such corruption. This poem is a prime example of literature depicting the corrupting influence of power in society.

Shakespeare begins the poem by expressing a desire for ‘release’ due to his exhaustion of the evils of corruption in the world. He then goes on to give examples of this corruption. Firstly, he claims that deserving people (possessing good qualities) are “beggar born”, whereas those people who lack positive characteristics are the ones who have all the wealth and riches, or “trimm’d in jollity”. This suggests that it is not actual qualities and traits that matter, but more so your social status. Shakespeare demonstrates the unfairness of life in that a “needy nothiing” can hold such a high position in society, and whether they really deserve it or not is irrelavent.

The next few lines explain how those who are righteous and of “purest faith” are lied to and betrayed, while the powerful and corrupted will dress up their own achievements and reputation to make themselves seem greater and more honourable than they actually are. This is shown in the phrase “gilded honour”, which suggests that corrupt individuals mask their evil and malicious ways with authority and power. This false honour is “shamefully misplaced” upon those who do not deserve it, yet righteous individuals are the ones who are deceived and kept downtrodden.

Shakespeare describes how individuals of “maiden virtue” and “right perfection” are wrongfully shamed and disgraced. They are bestowed with unpleasant reputations in society, although they do not deserve this treatment. The phrase “rudely strumpeted” suggests virtue being forced into evil ways by corrupt society, and therefore forced into a bad image.

The word “strength” is used to refer to moral thinking and morally right decisions and actions. “Limping sway” personifies corruption as an elderly or crippled figure who is able to ‘pull strings’ and manipulate things in their favour and at the expense of the strong, new talent with fresh ideas. Shakespeare describes the “strength” as being disabled by those who use their influence and power to corrupt ideas and manipulate perceptions of people in order to suit their own views and ideologies. This perhaps reflects on the suppression of younger individuals in climbing the ‘success ladder’ and rising up in society, through the use of authority, power and conservative/traditional systems. This is also a reflection on media using bias to represent an individual or party’s opinions.

The next line describes art and talent as being “tongue-tied by authority”, meaning that authority would stamp down on the abilities and potentials of others. In relation to this, the next line includes the phrase “folly, doctor-like”, which refers to an ignorant person who is disguised as a qualified professional or expert. This line explains how these ‘phonies’ who lack real talent will use their power and authority to make themselves seem superior to those who are actually more talented and skilled than they are. This shows how power can lead to people corrupting and defiling the images of others and make themselves seem better.

As with “right perfection” being “wrongly disgraced” (7th line), in line 11 Shakespeare state that honesty and “simple truth” is “miscalled simplicity”, meaning that honesty is falsely regarded as being wrong and ignorant. This again reflects on how power is used to suppress truths from being exposed, especially if these truths conflict their own interests. Here, again, is an example of truths being unjustly criticised and disregarded by the media.
The last point Shakespeare makes when saying “captive good attending captain evil” is that the person with the good qualities is always serving or working for the corrupted person in authority, perhaps against their own will if they are ‘captives’. This expresses the unpleasant circumstances in life where the evil are in a position of control over the righteous.

Reflecting on the very first line in the poem, Shakespeare ends the poem by stating a desire to “escape from it all”, but he is being held back by the fact that he will have to leave the one(s) he loves.

Book: Animal Farm by George Orwell

In Animal Farm, the story begins with a rebellion of farm animals against their human owners. The original idea of these animals, led by pigs, were that all animals were to be treated equally and not be enslaved or serve any human. The animals were to live and work for themselves to create a better life for them. The Seven Commandments of Animalism were created to ensure that they do not follow the human ways and become like them. As the story progresses we see many acts of corruption by the pigs, who use their power of being intelligent and well-spoken to get away with not doing manual labour on the farm and even breaking their own commandments to do human like things, such as drink alcohol or sleep in beds. The pigs abuse their power in many ways so that they mantain the animals’ loyalty and yet still do these human like things.

Acts of corruption in the earlier stages of the book by the pigs are little things, such as obtaining the majority of the milk and apples for themselves. They told the animals lies about how the pigs need it to be able to improve the farm and keep the pigs healthy. They also told them that their human owners would return if the pigs did not have these luxuries which was also a lie. This frightened the other animals and prevented any protests from them.

As the pigs had more and more access to power, their greed grew and grew and the acts of corruption became greater. At one point, there was a feud among the leaders of the pigs; Napoloen and Snowball. Just when it looked like Snowball was going to win the loyalty of the animals, Napoloen used brute force to gain control and full leadership of the farm. He commanded a number of dogs to kill Snowball which chased him away thus giving Napoloen all the power in the farm. Another act of corruption by Napoloen was when he threatened the animals with the dogs if they attempted to protest. Napoloen is using his power to unfairly control and scare the animals into following him.

Napoloem then uses his well-spoken pigs to implement a mindset into the gullible animals on the farm which are to work harder and to believe that what Napoloen says is always right. The pigs are corrupt and they use their powers to manipulate the animals into serving the pigs. With this, the pigs do more and more human like things, like living in the house, drinking whiskey and trading with other humans. They eventually break their own Commandments resulting into them being changed. They take advantage of the other animals inablilty to read and their short memories by doing this. This is another act of corruption fueled by the pigs’ power and desires to be like humans, which is the complete opposite of their original objective.

One of the more serious acts of corruption is the massacre of the animals, when Napoleon orders his dogs to kill all supposed traitors and the leave a pile of dead bodies. This struck fear in all the animals and forced them to swallow lies about how Napoleon is their true leader and that Snowball is their enemy.

This book is a prime example of how the influence of power leads to corruption and that the greater the power someone has, the greater the acts of corruption becomes because they can use that power to get away with it. This is shown in the book because at the beginning, the acts of corruption were small and were only used for small benefits for the pigs over the rest of the animals. As the pigs gained more and more power, for example acquiring the service of the dogs who act as a military force, the acts of corruption became more serious which involved threats and murder. At the end of the book, the animals on the farm find it impossible to tell the difference between the pigs and the humans. I believe the George Orwell’s message is that there are people who despise people in authority and refuse to be anything like them. However, as they gain access to power, they become corrupted and they commit acts of corruption which cause them to be just like the people in authority. This shows that the influence of power, corrupts.

Film: The Shawshank Redemption

The Shawshank Redemption is a critically acclaimed film about prison life the different types of corruption that occur in the prison system. The film follows the story of Andy Dufresne, a man who was falsely convicted for murder and sent to prison. He befriends another inmate called Red (as well as other characters), and attempts to survive the hostile prison life at Shawshank Prison and gain protection and benefits from the corrupted officers in charge. Many different characters commit these acts and the people with more power, do greater and worse acts.

Red, who is serving a life sentnce, is a black marketeer who is known for getting whatever items he wants by bribing the guards. He then sells these items (usually cigarettes) to other inmates. This is an example of corruption because the guards are taking bribes by prisoners and getting them goods illegally from outside the prison, therefore breaking laws for personal gain.

Andy, whose occupation was a banker before he was arrested and charged, earned protection from the guards by helping the guard captain, Hadley, sort out his money problems with the bank and his wife. In a later scene, Andy was almost beaten to death by another inmate called Bogs, consequently resulting in Bogs being excessively beaten by Hadley as punishment and getting crippled for life. This shows two forms of corruption: Firstly, the guard captain used illegal and unnecessary force to punish a prisoner yet he got away with it; The other was that he was showing favouritism for Andy over the other inmates because he had previously been helped by Andy. It may also be that he decided to severely punish Bogs for almost killing a ‘valuable’ prisoner who he can get more services from. Hadley used his power as a high ranked officer to get away with this crime which shows that power allows people to be corrupt because they think they can get away with it.

The Warden of Shawshank Prison is the main antagonist in the film. Being in charge of the prison, the Warden is the key figure in the story for demonstrating the corrupting of power. His main act of corruption is using Andy to aid him in laundering money from his scams. The warden uses his power to protect Andy from harm in the prison so he can keep laundering money. The warden also takes bribes from a number of people who are caught in his scam so that they can get out of it. These actions are caused by the warden’s recognition of his own power and what he is capable of, and that he has the power to cover it up and get away unpunished.

At one point, there’s hope for Andy being released from Shawshank as the arrival of a young thief, Tommy, has information that could prove Andy’s innocence. When Andy tells the Warden about this, the Warden, in fear of losing his money cleaner, has Tommy killed, preventing him from being able to give evidence to prove Andy’s innocence. He then threatens to take away everything away from Andy if he decides to stop helping him. This shows how the warden uses his power in ways of corruption, such as having someone murdered in order to keep the truth from coming out, and to deny a man his rightful freedom just so he can carry on illegally recieving money.

By the end of the film, Andy escapes and, using a false name, reveals the Warden’s corruption to the outside world, resulting in the Warden’s arrest. However, the Warden decides to take his own life before he could be taken off to prison. Power has influenced the Warden into thinking he could commit these acts of corruption and get away with it. He was enjoying his rule over the lives of others in prison and giving out harsh and unfair punishments, but when the tables turn on him and he is the one facing conviction, he would rather take his own life than be on the receiving end of punishments himself. This film shows how people with power become corrupt and that the different levels of power cause different levels of corruption.

Exam style question

In Hannah Furness’ article, she uses the word “betrayed” to describe what the grassroots Tories did to David Cameron. The word betrayed is used to describe traitors so the journalist is depicting the senior local Conservatives as traitors to the conservatives. This is a method of giving a negative impression about them to execute her subjective position that these grassroots Tories are in the wrong. The journalist to the other article, Juliette Jowit, chose to use certain facts to support her subjective position on the story. She used figures like, “303 Conservative MPs and more than twice that many parliamentary consistencies in the UK” to show how many Tories are rebelling against the bill. This method convinces the reader that there are many people in David Cameron’s own party that are voting against him. This tells the reader that there is uncertainty in the party which could imply that the bill is wrong which would support the journalist’s subjective position.

Analysing adverts

The adverts intention is to challenge people to prove that they aren’t addicted to or “hooked” on smoking. The picture is of a cigarette shaped like a fishhook and there are people below it with the mouth open like they are about to bite for the bait. The punch line of the ad is “… and you’re hooked…”. The advert is a pun although the topic is quite serious and the created has used the pun to flatter the audience by trusting them to understand the joke. The audience for this advert is for smokers who are addicted to smoking and it challenges them to stop being “hooked” on cigarettes.